|
|
||||||||
Innovations and Ideas
Department of Physiology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: cardiovascular physiology; medical education; case-based teaching; theory-practice gap
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In her discussion paper on the future of teaching physiology, Sefton (14) illustrates, with the aid of a diagram (Fig. 1), the relationship between physiology and other medical sciences. Physiology lies at its center, sharing boundaries with multiple medical sciences. Sefton raises some of the problems that may arise in designing appropriate courses since the shared boundaries are often ill defined. However, blurred and dynamic borders with other disciplines offer exciting opportunities for physiology to play an integrative role in bringing together learning in these related medical disciplines.
|
Modell (10) reminds us that the call to embrace an active learning environment in science (17) and medical education (1) is not new. He defines an active learning environment as "... one in which students engage in the process of building and testing their own mental models from information that they are acquiring." Glaser (7) reports that teaching to develop this type of cognitive activity, rather than teaching to deliver knowledge, fosters competence. In the CBT setting, we wished to provide a learner-centered active environment as an alternative to the predominant passive-learning environment of the teacher-centered lecture. By giving students the opportunity to assume some responsibility for their learning, we aimed to develop independent, lifelong learning skills for use when they moved beyond the guidance of their teachers into professional practice.
Glaser (7), Brown et al. (3), and Perkins and Salomon (11), in their articles on learning, cognition, and educational practice, inform us of the social and situational context of learning. They discuss research that describes how students adopt forms of thinking they witness in others and the way in which the various social and physical features of the environment can support learning. Learning in small groups, such as in CBT, has added cognitive benefits due to collaborative effort. Contributions in a group amplify the available knowledge, presenting alternative problem solving and reasoning approaches. Self-regulatory activity is also increased as each student receives feedback from peers. Peers support and monitor individuals thinking, opinions, and beliefs. They can help clarify difficult points or offer alternative points of view to challenge a learners initial understanding. Complex tasks, such as problem solving or learning new psychomotor skills, can be made more manageable by sharing it among learners in a group.
Brown et al. (3) describe the positive cognitive accomplishments of learners who engage in tasks and problem-solving activities that have meaningful outcomes for them. In our initiative, a case-based learning environment was chosen because it represented an authentic domain of work for medical students. In the sessions, tutors encouraged students to understand the problems and challenges that competent medical practitioners encounter. While cases were chosen to facilitate learning in human structure and function, shared boundaries with related medical sciences were embraced as another opportunity to assist students to integrate rather than compartmentalize their knowledge. The initiative had the following objectives:
The small group CBT learning environment and the perceived advantages of students learning with their peers as patients has previously been described in a short report. Chang and Power (4) reported student comfort in practicing peer physical examinations (PPEs) on fellow classmates at the University of Minnesota Medical School, and we also found that students were willing to participate in PPEs. Like these authors, we also felt that peer-peer interactions were valuable for introductory physical examination skills because students have time to practice and gain feedback from their colleagues on their techniques. Chang and Power (4) suggest that PPEs may also help develop camaraderie among students. At Adelaide University, CBT tutors reported a similar benefit from the history-taking role-play. This represented an extra bonus from the peer-instruction learning environment, since medical student feedback from 10 North American medical schools identified student camaraderie as an important element of medical school learning (12).
| EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Session 1: taking a cardiovascular history.
The objective of this session was to reveal how normal blood pressure control is one of the determinants of an upright posture and how presenting symptoms form an understanding of structure and function. Students brainstormed possible hypotheses to explain the presentation of an elderly woman who collapsed in a supermarket on a warm afternoon. This led to a variety of diagnoses ranging from a vasovagal attack, through possible cardiovascular causes, to neurological dysfunction, with students being prompted to explain the mechanism of their hypotheses. Students were able to draw on their previous learning experiences to develop a rich discussion.
After this, the tutor role-played the patient, and a student role-played the doctor to obtain a history of the presenting complaint. The cardiovascular system review questions formed a critical part of the questioning, with students being prompted to consider how each symptom formed an understanding of underlying structure and function. Other group members shared the role of the doctor to determine the social, family, past, medication, and allergy history from the patient. The role-playing involved all students and added to the "icebreaker" activities of the first session. Finally, the history was summarized, leading to an important discussion of what features of the history were salient to determine whether normal structure and function were perturbed in this case. The presence of hyperlipidemia, hypertension, a family history of ischemic heart disease, possible reflux disease, a recent emotional stress, and the use of an "anginine" tablet while standing expanded the differential diagnosis and discussion.
Session 2: examination of the precordium and interpretation of the electrocardiograph.
This sessions aim was to relate the mechanical, electrical, and valvular events of the cardiac cycle to examination of the precordium. In this session and using their peers as patients, students obtained hands-on experience with a tutor facilitating their efforts. Tutors ensured that students were comfortable examining and being examined by their colleagues, and students enjoyed working with self-selected peers. Screened examination bays were provided for student pairs who preferred this more private location.
An understanding of the surface anatomy of the precordium underpinned the examination of the precordium and the subsequent placement of the electrocardiograph (ECG) leads on the chest. For these medical students who were recent high school graduates, it provided their first opportunity to auscultate normal heart sounds and see how an ECG tracing was obtained.
Because arrhythmia had been tendered as a possible hypothesis to explain the syncopal episode, an ECG was suggested as a way of testing this hypothesis. To understand how a 12-lead ECG is obtained, students recorded tracings from volunteers in their group. Placement of the chest leads prompted a discussion of the surface anatomy of the thorax as well as possible technical difficulties. This activity also reinforced a basic understanding of what the ECG illustrates about the structure and function of the heart, how to calculate the heart rate (HR) from the ECG, and why sinus arrhythmia may be seen with inspiration and expiration. The HR response to a Valsalva maneuver was also recorded and discussed. Students were able to compare the ECG tracings of their "normal" peers with the normal ECG of the elderly woman from the syncope case. This led to an appreciation of the wide variation of normals, and the discussion of differences fostered a greater understanding of the ECG.
Session 3: evaluation of the peripheral pulses and arterial blood pressure.
In this session, we aimed to show how the peripheral vasculature and arterial blood pressure are examined to assess their state. Students used their anatomical knowledge to determine the optimal sites for palpation of the peripheral pulses and were challenged to consider the basis of auscultation of the systolic and diastolic blood pressures.
With an understanding of how the signs are obtained, the students were then able to integrate the physical examination and investigation findings with the previously obtained symptoms to test their hypotheses for the case. It highlighted the common problem of hypotension in the elderly and factors that may precipitate it. The final case discussion summarized how events such as rapid postural change, nitrate-induced venous pooling, diuretic-induced reduction in circulating blood volume, or baroreflex dysfunction due to age may contribute to low cerebral perfusion and syncope.
In the fourth session, before the respiratory system CBT sessions commenced, there was a brief cardiovascular review to consolidate learning from the previous sessions. Students had the opportunity to perform a complete cardiovascular examination to integrate the individual components they had tried in the previous three sessions. Again the emphasis was on basic skills rather than a sophisticated physical examination of the cardiovascular system.
| EVIDENCE FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Two open-ended questions in relation to CBT sought more qualitative data from the same cohort of students, and their responses are summarized in Table 1. Eighty percent of students highlighted the hands-on experience as the best feature of the tutorials. Many enjoyed the opportunity to use "the medical equipment" in a relaxed environment with a small group of their peers. It was their first introduction to history taking and clinical examination, and 21% of students felt that the tutorials provided them with a learning environment in which they could integrate these introductory clinical skills with their developing theoretical knowledge. Many unsolicited comments expressed how CBT was a learning format that stimulated their interest in structure and function, where they could apply learning from other settings in a clinical context. A selection of responses to the question "What aspects of the tutorials did you like best?" supports these conclusions.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An understanding of human function underpins the practice of medicine, and in a medical curriculum, it is the framework on which to pin further medical science knowledge and skills. Walton and Matthews (19) make the analogy of a medical curriculum being like a house. The bricks and mortar alone do not make the house. It needs a structure that bonds the building blocks together. Figure 1 has previously illustrated physiologys structural role in bonding together related medical sciences in a medical curriculum. This diagram has been expanded in Fig. 3 to illustrate how, in the CBT initiative, physiology played an integrative role in the learning derived from the evaluation of a case of syncope. To capture the full educational opportunity from these interactions for the vocational training of medical students, understanding of function must be linked to practice.
|
In the 1910s, as the style of medical training evolved from the earlier apprenticeship model to the "Flexner" (5) approach in which a grounding in basic sciences was stressed, clinical skills training began to be separated from the teaching of theory. In the next wave of medical curricular reform over the last three decades, attempts have been made to close the widened gap between theory and practice. In many institutions, however, clinical skill development, although occurring earlier in the medical course, has been placed in a "skills" curriculum stream, parallel to, but separate from, a "scientific basis of medicine" stream. Further efforts are required to ensure that basic sciences such as physiology are truly integrated with the development of clinical skills and practice.
The essence of medical practice is diagnosis and management. After history taking, physical examination, and investigations are concluded, the practitioner must reflect on the findings and why the client has presented at this time. This judgment requires more than a technical command of the knowledge base. Schon (13) warns university educators against fostering professional knowledge that fails to include practical competence and professional artistry. He believes that professional education has tended to concentrate on the acquisition of a knowledge base, assuming the practical know-how is automatically acquired by learners. In most professions, novices gradually develop into experts by acquiring skills as they gather experience, and in medicine, this traditionally occurred in an apprenticeship environment. Here, theory was not separated from practice. It does, however, have other problems. This teaching environment has been less available with a rise in student numbers paralleling a decline in hospital patient numbers (2), and it is now less valued due to the difficulties it poses in the reliable assessment of medical students (16).
The CBT initiative has aimed to address this theory-practice gap by linking a problem-based learning approach with the development of practical competence so that students have a usable knowledge of human structure and function. It aimed to develop both the art and science of medicine early in the training of young medical undergraduates in a learning environment that built confidence to undertake the journey through to competence. Margetson (9) sees learning to become a thoroughly competent practitioner as " ...the development of an integrated, coherent growing web of understanding, knowledge, and skill in practice." By careful selection of problems that reflect the whole world of the professional practitioner, all the associated learning experiences can add to the "growing web". In this way, exciting scientific advances at "the bench" can be transformed into usable knowledge "at the bedside."
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This initiative was developed with the support of an Adelaide University Teaching Development grant.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. Hudson, Dept. of Physiology, Adelaide Univ., Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia (E-mail: nicky.hudson{at}adelaide.edu.au).
Received 29 May 2001; accepted in final form 13 September 2001
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. H. Guilford "Shrink Wrapping" Lectures: Teaching Cell and Molecular Biology within the Context of Human Pathologies CBE Life Sci Educ, June 1, 2005; 4(2): 138 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Hudson and P. Buckley An evaluation of case-based teaching: evidence for continuing benefit and realization of aims Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2004; 28(1): 15 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |