|
|
||||||||
Physiologists' Forum
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Creighton University, School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68178
| AN INVITATION TO READERS The editors welcome readers' contributions in the form of letters about any aspect of physiology education. Please write to the Editor, Advances in Physiology Education, American Physiological Society, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3991.
|
To the Editor:
I read, with great interest, the article by D. P. Swain in the December 2000 issue of Advances in Physiology Education (2). The paper was very well written and stimulating.
As I looked into the operation of the water-tower system more carefully, it became clear that the differences between the two systems are striking and fundamental. The following is an outline of the major differences.
WATER-TOWER SYSTEM
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM
From this summary, it is clear that the dynamics of flow in the water-tower system are very dissimilar to that of the cardiovascular system. I find that the initial presentation of the water-tower system to students would introduce misconceptions that might be difficult to eradicate, particularly the role of gravity in the circulation of blood. In my opinion, students would do better by studying the cardiovascular system as such without the water-tower analogy. My experience in teaching medical and dental students has shown that presenting the dynamics of circulation without analogies entails no difficulties in conveying the basics. A more thorough presentation of the role of gravity in open and closed systems has been discussed by Hicks and Badeer (1).
REFERENCES
Wellness Institute and Research Center, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529-0196, dswain@odu.edu
REPLY
To the Editor:
H. S. Badeer has raised interesting points regarding the analogy of a municipal water-tower system and the cardiovascular system. He is correct in stating in point no. 1 that the former is an open system while the latter is a closed system, and this point was addressed in my article. In regard to Dr. Badeers remaining three points, the two systems are much more similar than they are dissimilar. Dr. Badeer states in point no. 2 that flow in the water-tower system is due to the gravitational potential of the water in the tower. However, it must be noted that the ultimate cause of this flow is not the tower but the energy imparted by the pump. Analogously, the aorta is the pressure head for blood flow, but the heart is the source of energy. As Dr. Badeer states in point no. 3, the gravitational pressure of the water in the tower is a force that must be overcome by the pump. This is analogous to the afterload placed on the heart by aortic blood pressure. Regarding Dr. Badeers fourth point, the analogy remains that, for both systems, flow can only occur when the pump provides sufficient energy to overcome opposing forces.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |