HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morton, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morton, J. P.

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. P. Morton, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores Univ., 15-21 Webster St., Liverpool L3 2ET, UK (e-mail: J.P.Morton{at}ljmu.ac.uk).

Abstract

In the sequel to their guidelines for reporting statistics in American Physiological Society journals, Curran-Everett and Benos highlighted that the initial guidelines of 2004 have had little effect on the statistical reporting practices of authors. In the present article, I suggest that the guidelines have also had little impact on both journal reviewers and editors. I present three cases of statistical reporting practices in which there appears to be considerable discrepancies between the author and reviewer and, moreover, inconsistencies between reviewers. I argue that for authors to comply with these guidelines, the initial challenge is to have a team of reviewers who are also willing to accept the unfamiliar. Indeed, the opinions of reviewers who are ill informed about relatively novel statistical methods and recommended reporting practices may have implications for the final editorial decision on the suitability of submitted manuscripts for publication.

Key words: standard deviation; statistical significance; sample size; confidence interval

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Curran-Everett and D. J. Benos Statistics, authors, and reviewers: the heart of the matter Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2009; 33(1): 80 - 80. [Full Text] [PDF]