|
|
||||||||
MEETING REPORTS
1 Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 2 Department of Biology, Edmonds Community College, Edmonds, Washington 3 Department of Biology, Canisius College, Buffalo, New York
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Michael, Dept. of Physiology, Rush Medical College, 1750 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612 (e-mail: jmichael{at}rush.edu)
Abstract
A second National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop on Conceptual Assessment in Biology was held in January 2008. Reports prepared for the workshop revealed that research groups working in a variety of biological sciences are continuing to develop conceptual assessment instruments for use in the classroom. Discussions at this meeting largely focused on two issues: 1) the utility of the backwards design approach of Wiggins and McTighe (11), in which identification of learning outcomes (determining what to assess) lies at the beginning of course design; and 2) the utility of defining expected learning outcomes as the building of runable mental models (and designing conceptual assessments that would test the correctness of these mental models). A third meeting is being planned that will focus on the processes involved in writing and validating conceptual assessment instruments.
Key words: biology concepts; mental models
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Michael, H. Modell, J. McFarland, and W. Cliff The "core principles" of physiology: what should students understand? Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2009; 33(1): 10 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |