HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Benos, D. J. Articles by Zotov, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Benos, D. J. Articles by Zotov, A.

A PERSONAL VIEW

The ups and downs of peer review

Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, Nutrition, and Vision Sciences, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama

Abstract

This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

Key words: publication; blinding

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Casadevall and F. C. Fang Is Peer Review Censorship? Infect. Immun., April 1, 2009; 77(4): 1273 - 1274. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Berquist Publication in the AJR: Critical Interactions among Authors, Reviewers, and Section Editors Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1291 - 1292. [Full Text] [PDF]