Adv Physiol Educ AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 30: 230-236, 2006; doi:10.1152/advan.00038.2006
1043-4046/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kibble, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kibble, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L.
ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 30:230-236, 2006
© 2006 American Physiological Society

TEACHING WITH PROBLEMS AND CASES

Use of modified SOAP notes and peer-led small-group discussion in a Medical Physiology course: addressing the hidden curriculum

Jonathan Kibble1, Penelope A. Hansen2 and Loren Nelson1

1 Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada 2 Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Kibble, Dept. of Physiology and Neuroscience, St. George's Univ., PO Box 7, St. George's, Grenada (e-mail: jkibble{at}sgu.edu)

Abstract

Peer leading of small-group discussion of cases; use of modified subjective, objective, assessment of physiology (SOAP) notes; and opportunities for self-assessment were introduced into a Medical Physiology course to increase students' awareness and practice of professional behaviors. These changes arose from faculty members' understanding of the hidden curriculum and their efforts to reveal it to take increased advantage of its educationally beneficial aspects. Faculty members and students observed that the requirement for students to submit SOAP notes before their discussions meant that they were well prepared to participate. Student satisfaction with the protocol was high, with >95% of the students agreeing that discussants were well prepared and that the overall performance of their discussion group was good. A comparison of students' performance on selected exam questions showed that peer leading was equally as effective as a previously used teacher-centered approach. Students agreed that their ability to analyze a clinical case had improved using this protocol, an effect that persisted at least one semester after the end of the course. These approaches were time and cost efficient from a faculty perspective while serving the needs of the students. The use of SOAP notes and peer-led discussion were effective forms of instruction, in which students succeeded in learning medical physiology and in practicing professional behaviors.

Key words: student facilitation; active learning; cooperative learning




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
J. D. Kibble
A peer-led supplemental tutorial project for medical physiology: implementation in a large class
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2009; 33(2): 111 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
M. J. Giuliodori, H. L. Lujan, and S. E. DiCarlo
Collaborative group testing benefits high- and low-performing students
Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2008; 32(4): 274 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.