Adv Physiol Educ ADInstruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 30: 89-93, 2006; doi:10.1152/advan.00044.2005
1043-4046/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Passos, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hermes-Lima, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Passos, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hermes-Lima, M.
ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 30:89-93, 2006
© 2006 American Physiological Society

TEACHING IN THE LABORATORY

Pizza and pasta help students learn metabolism

Renato M. Passos1,2, Alexandre B. Sé1,2, Vanessa L. Wolff2, Yanna K. M. Nobrega3 and Marcelo Hermes-Lima1

1 Oxyradical Research Group, Departamento de Biologia Celular
2 Faculdade de Medicina
3 Hospital Universitário, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Hermes-Lima, Oxyradical Research Group, Departamento de Biologia Celular, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil (e-mail: hermes{at}unb.br or m_hermes_lima{at}yahoo.com.br)

In this article, we report on an experiment designed to improve the learning of metabolic biochemistry by nutrition and medical undergraduate students. Twelve students participated in a monitored lunch and had their blood extracted for analysis 1) before lunch, 2) 30 min after lunch, and 3) 3 h after lunch. The subjects were divided in two groups. One group had a hyperglicidic meal [pasta plus orange juice: 80% carbohydrate, 10% protein, and 10% lipid (estimated values)] and the other group had a hyperlipidic meal (calabresi pizza plus diet soda: 36% carbohydrate, 18% protein, and 46% lipid). Individual quantities of food were based on body mass index, age, and sex. The blood parameters analyzed were glucose, triglycerides (TG), and urea. Glucose remained constant in the three measurements in both groups. The TG concentration in the pasta group was constant before and after lunch but increased significantly during the evening. In the pizza group, TG increased after lunch and remained constant in the evening. Levels of urea increased only in the evening, specially in the pizza group. These results were used for the final biochemistry exam. With the maximum score set as 10, the average score was 6.0 ± 2.4 (n = 102). We considered this activity a unique way of evaluating important issues on metabolism, because students had several hours to work on the final exam (with free access to a bibliography). It was also a good didactic experience (problem-based learning like) for the subject students, because they had to work in all phases of the experiment (idealization, realization, and analysis) and participated actively in the elaboration and correction of the exam.

Key words: physiology; biochemistry; nutrition; medical education; problem-based learning




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
A. B. Se, R. M. Passos, A. H. Ono, and M. Hermes-Lima
The use of multiple tools for teaching medical biochemistry
Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2008; 32(1): 38 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.