Adv Physiol Educ ADInstruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 29: 194-196, 2005; doi:10.1152/advan.00032.2005
1043-4046/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lobb, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lobb, D.
ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 29:194-196, 2005
© 2005 American Physiological Society

A PERSONAL VIEW

Problem-based learning and the medical school: another case of the emperor’s new clothes?

Richard Butler1, David Inman2 and Derek Lobb3

1 Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. Butler, Dept. of Pathology and Molecular Medicine and Education Program in Anatomy, McMaster Univ., HSC-1R1, 1200 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5 (e-mail: butlerr{at}mcmaster.ca)

Abstract

For almost four decades, problem-based learning (PBL) has been the stated cornerstone of learning in many medical schools. Proponents of PBL cite the open nature of the learning experience where students are free to study in depth, unencumbered by the burdens of broad courses based on the memorization of facts; detractors, on the other hand, cite the lack of breadth and factual knowledge required for professional qualification. Both points of view have merit. Professional schools have a different set of needs and requirements, and it is these that drive the curriculum and learning philosophies. The constraints of the professional school are so different from those of the purely academic environment that PBL, while admirably suited to the latter, is just problem solving in the former.

Key words: medical education




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
H. von Bergmann, K. R. Dalrymple, S. Wong, and C. F. Shuler
Investigating the Relationship Between PBL Process Grades and Content Acquisition Performance in a PBL Dental Program
J Dent Educ., September 1, 2007; 71(9): 1160 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.