|
|
||||||||
A PERSONAL VIEW
1 Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. Butler, Dept. of Pathology and Molecular Medicine and Education Program in Anatomy, McMaster Univ., HSC-1R1, 1200 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5 (e-mail: butlerr{at}mcmaster.ca)
Abstract
For almost four decades, problem-based learning (PBL) has been the stated cornerstone of learning in many medical schools. Proponents of PBL cite the open nature of the learning experience where students are free to study in depth, unencumbered by the burdens of broad courses based on the memorization of facts; detractors, on the other hand, cite the lack of breadth and factual knowledge required for professional qualification. Both points of view have merit. Professional schools have a different set of needs and requirements, and it is these that drive the curriculum and learning philosophies. The constraints of the professional school are so different from those of the purely academic environment that PBL, while admirably suited to the latter, is just problem solving in the former.
Key words: medical education
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. von Bergmann, K. R. Dalrymple, S. Wong, and C. F. Shuler Investigating the Relationship Between PBL Process Grades and Content Acquisition Performance in a PBL Dental Program J Dent Educ., September 1, 2007; 71(9): 1160 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |