Adv Physiol Educ ADInstruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 28: 188-194, 2004; doi:10.1152/advan.00029.2003
1043-4046/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trueblood, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trueblood, N. A.
ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 28:188-194, 2004
© 2004 American Physiological Society

HOW WE TEACH

Non-science majors gain valuable insight studying clinical trials literature: an evidence-based medicine library assignment

Janet S. Russell, Lucy Martin, Dara Curtin, Sara Penhale and Nathan A. Trueblood

Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. A. Trueblood, 801 National Rd. W., Richmond, IN 47374 (E-mail: truebna{at}earlham.edu)

When faced with a diagnosis, it is empowering to be able to assess the evidence of treatment effectiveness and safety. To teach this skill to non-science majors, we assigned the "Responsible Patienthood Project" (RPP). For the RPP, students studied an array of disease and treatment literature: the final product of their work was a poster presentation, in which they did an in-depth analysis of one primary article, thus encouraging critical evaluation of experimental design, methods, and conclusions. Post-RPP, there was a 35% decrease in the student perception that they would unquestioningly accept a recommended treatment for a hypothetical diagnosis, and a 40% increase in the perception that they would consult a combination of resources, including primary articles. We recommend this project based on our results that suggest 1) non-science majors are able to successfully access and assess primary scientific literature, 2) students felt empowered by the RPP, and 3) skills in information gathering, via library instruction, may serve as a particularly helpful lifelong learning tool.

Key words: undergraduate student; general education; diagnosis; clinical research; lifelong learning




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Buckner, J. Beck, K. Browning, A. Fritz, L. Grantham, E. Hoxha, Z. Kamvar, A. Lough, O. Nikolova, P. S. Schnable, et al.
Involving Undergraduates in the Annotation and Analysis of Global Gene Expression Studies: Creation of a Maize Shoot Apical Meristem Expression Database
Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 741 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cellbioedHome page
C. M. Gillen
Criticism and Interpretation: Teaching the Persuasive Aspects of Research Articles
CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 34 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.