Adv Physiol Educ ADInstruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 277: 127S-135S, 1999;
1043-4046/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michael, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michael, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.

Vol. 277, Issue 6, S127-S135, 12-1-99

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY

Joel A. Michael, Daniel Richardson, Allen Rovick, Harold Modell, David Bruce, Barbara Horwitz, Margaret Hudson, Dee Silverthorn, Shirley Whitescarver, and Steven Williams

Approximately 700 undergraduates studying physiology at community colleges, a liberal arts college, and universities were surveyed to determine the prevalence of four misconceptions about respiratory phenomena. A misconception about the changes in breathing frequency and tidal volume (physiological variables whose changes can be directly sensed) that result in increased minute ventilation was found to be present in this population with comparable prevalence (~60%) to that seen in a previous study (9). Three other misconceptions involving phenomena that cannot be experienced directly and therefore were most likely learned in some educational setting were found to be of varying prevalence. Nearly 90% of the students exhibited a misconception about the relationship between arterial oxygen partial pressure and hemoglobin saturation. Sixty-six percent of the students believed that increasing alveolar oxygen partial pressure leads to a decrease in alveolar carbon dioxide partial pressure. Nearly 33% of the population misunderstood the relationship between metabolism and ventilation. The possible origins of these respiratory misconceptions are discussed and suggestions for how to prevent and/or remediate them are proposed.AM. J. PHYSIOL. 277 (ADV. PHYSIOL. EDUC. 22): S127-S135, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
H. I. Modell, J. A. Michael, T. Adamson, and B. Horwitz
Enhancing active learning in the student laboratory
Advan Physiol Educ, September 1, 2004; 28(3): 107 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
J. A. Michael, M. P. Wenderoth, H. I. Modell, W. Cliff, B. Horwitz, P. McHale, D. Richardson, D. Silverthorn, S. Williams, and S. Whitescarver
Undergraduates' understanding of cardiovascular phenomena
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2002; 26(2): 72 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online