There is increasing demand on science faculty to develop authentic assessment measures for both individual courses and undergraduate programs. We report here on a quarter-long group project used in a neurophysiology course that can be used for either purpose. Small groups of four to five students critically analyze at least 10 articles from the primary scientific literature. The end result of this process is the equivalent of a scientific review article that is presented in two formats, a 10-min oral presentation and a scientific poster presentation. Students perform better on application tasks than on analysis, synthesis, or evaluation tasks associated with the project (P < 0.025) and generally respond positively to process questions (59-82%) but less positively to task questions (36-76%) about group dynamics. The cognitive skills and basic content knowledge required to complete this project are developed throughout the undergraduate program. Thus the project is a type of culminating program experience. However, the project also assesses basic course proficiency, because students cannot analyze primary neuroscience research without an understanding of neurophysiological principles.