Adv Physiol Educ AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 27: 109-119, 2003; doi:10.1152/advan.00042.2002
1043-4046/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krontiris-Litowitz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krontiris-Litowitz, J.
ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 27:109-119, 2003
© 2003 American Physiological Society

HOW WE TEACH

USING MANIPULATIVES TO IMPROVE LEARNING IN THE UNDERGRADUATE NEUROPHYSIOLOGY CURRICULUM

Johanna Krontiris-Litowitz

Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown Ohio 44555

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Krontiris-Litowitz, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, One University Plaza, Youngstown OH 44555 (E-mail: jkrontirislitowitz{at}ysu.edu)

Educational research has demonstrated that the use of concrete objects or manipulatives in the classroom enhances problem-solving skills and conceptual learning. This project examines the use of manipulatives in a neurophysiology curriculum and assesses their effectiveness on student comprehension. Three activities, building an ion channel, building a nerve cell, and passive membrane properties, were developed using modeling clay and beads as manipulatives. Their effect on learning was assessed in a neurobiology class that had been divided into an experimental group that worked with manipulative-based activities and a control group that did not. After the experimental group had completed the manipulative activity, both groups were given a quiz. Students who had used manipulatives scored significantly better than those who had not. In a second study, students were given a quiz before and after completing a manipulative activity. Students who had used manipulatives showed the greatest grade improvement. These studies suggest that manipulative activities can be used to enhance learning in the neurophysiology curriculum.

Key words: active learning; conceptual models; constructivism




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
J. Krontiris-Litowitz
Using truncated lectures, conceptual exercises, and manipulatives to improve learning in the neuroanatomy classroom
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2008; 32(2): 152 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
M. Kommalage and S. Gunawardena
IT-based activity in physiology education: an experience from a developing country
Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2008; 32(1): 81 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.