Adv Physiol Educ Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 27: 53-61, 2003; doi:10.1152/advan.00049.2002
1043-4046/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isman, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yegen, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isman, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yegen, B. C.
ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 27:53-61, 2003
© 2003 American Physiological Society

HOW WE TEACH

HYPERTENSION MODULE: AN INTERACTIVE LEARNING TOOL IN PHYSIOLOGY

Ç. A. Isman, M. A. Gülpinar, H. Kurtel, I. Alican and B. Ç. Yegen

Department of Physiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul 813267, Turkey

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the strong or weak aspects of an interactive study module introduced during the "Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems Subject Committee" in the second year of the medical program. Five study groups consisting of 25 students attended two-hour module sessions for six weeks with the same tutor. According to the module assessment questionnaire, the majority of the students assessed the module as excellent or good. The students reported that they had gained not only in knowledge but also in skills development. The general opinion of the students was that both the organization and the implementation of the module met their expectations. Nearly one-half of the students reported that their expectations with regard to the educational environment and the participation of students were fully met. The major weakness in this new educational trial appears to be assessment of the module.

Key words: physiology education; didactic lectures; small-group study; student feedback







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.