Adv Physiol Educ Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 25: 167-175, 2001;
1043-4046/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guilford, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guilford, W. H.
ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 25:167-175, 2001
© 2001 American Physiological Society

Innovations and Ideas

TEACHING PEER REVIEW AND THE PROCESS OF SCIENTIFIC WRITING

William H. Guilford

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908

Many undergraduate and graduate students understand neither the process of scientific writing nor the significance of peer review. In response, some instructors have created writing assignments that teach or mimic parts of the scientific publishing process. However, none fully reproduced peer review and revision of papers together with the writing and publishing process from research to final, accepted draft. In addition, most have been instituted at the graduate rather than undergraduate level. We present a detailed method for teaching undergraduate students the full scientific publishing process, including anonymous peer review, during the process of writing a "term paper." The result is a review article in the format for submission to a major scientific journal. This method has been implemented in the course Cell and Molecular Biology for Engineers at the University of Virginia. Use of this method resulted in improved grades, much higher quality in the final manuscript, greater objectivity in grading, and improved understanding of the importance of peer review.

Key words: undergraduate; cell biology; molecular biology; referees; term paper; writing assignments




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. M. Sleister
Isolation and Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutants Defective in Chromosome Transmission in an Undergraduate Genetics Research Course
Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 677 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
P. J. McDonnell
The Role of Tabloids in Ophthalmic Education: Pro
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2004; 122(9): 1379 - 1380.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online