Adv Physiol Educ AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 24: 56-61, 2000;
1043-4046/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Birge, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Birge, B.

Vol. 24, Issue 1, 56-61, 12-1-00

EFFECTS OF AN APPLIED SUPPLEMENTAL COURSE ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN ELEMENTARY PHYSIOLOGY

Daniel Richardson, and Barbara Birge

The objective of this study was to determine whether students within a large (100-160 students) didactic lecture-based course, "Elementary Physiology" (EP), who were given an active-learning opportunity would perform better on objective examinations over EP material compared with their classroom peers who did not have the same active-learning experience. This was achieved by offering the EP students the option of taking a supplemental one credit hour discussion-based course, "Case Studies in Physiology" (CSP). Approximately 14% of the EP students opted for the CSP course. The format of CSP consisted of a one-hour-per-week discussion of applied problems based on the factual information presented in EP. On a subjective scale of 1 to 4, the CSP students felt that the course helped them to understand the EP material (3.5). This was reflected in the EP examination results for which the CSP students scored significantly higher compared with their non-CSP peers (81.1% vs. 75.7%; P < 0.05). These results indicate that when active-learning methods, such as discussion of applied problems, are used as a supplement to didactic lectures in physiology, performance on objective examinations of lecture material is improved. ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 24: 56-61,2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
W. H. Cliff
Case study analysis and the remediation of misconceptions about respiratory physiology
Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2006; 30(4): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
K. S. Nageswari, A. S. Malhotra, N. Kapoor, and G. Kaur
Pedagogical effectiveness of innovative teaching methods initiated at the Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Chandigarh
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2004; 28(2): 51 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
N. J. Pelaez
PROBLEM-BASED WRITING WITH PEER REVIEW IMPROVES ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PHYSIOLOGY
Advan Physiol Educ, September 1, 2002; 26(3): 174 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online