Adv Physiol Educ ADInstruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advan. Physiol. Edu. 24: 51-55, 2000;
1043-4046/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, S. E.

Vol. 24, Issue 1, 51-55, 12-1-00

PEER INSTRUCTION IMPROVES PERFORMANCE ON QUIZZES

Sumangala P. Rao, and Stephen E. DiCarlo

Peer instruction is a cooperative-learning technique that promotes critical thinking, problem solving, and decision-making skills. Benson's think-pair-share and Mazur's peer-instruction techniques are simple cooperative exercises that promote student's participation in class and increase student's interaction with each other and with the instructor in a large classroom. We borrowed concepts from Benson and Mazur and applied these concepts to enhance student involvement during the respiratory component of the medical physiology class. The medical physiology class consisted of 256 first-year medical students. The peer-instruction technique was used for 10 classes. Each class of 50 min was divided into three or four short presentations of 12-20 min. Each presentation was followed by a one-question, multiple-choice quiz on the subject discussed. Questions ranged from simple recall to those testing complex intellectual activities. Students were given 1 min to think and to record their first answer. Subsequently, students were allowed 1 min to discuss their answers with their classmates and possibly correct their first response. The percentage of correct answers increased significantly (P < 0.05) after discussion for both recall and intellectual questions. These data demonstrate that pausing three to four times during a 50-min class to allow discussion of concepts enhanced the students level of understanding and ability to synthesize and integrate material. ADV PHYSIOL EDUC 24: 51-55, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
K. Crossgrove and K. L. Curran
Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-Level Biology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course Material
CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 146 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
J. A. Slater, H. L. Lujan, and S. E. DiCarlo
Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students?
Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2007; 31(4): 336 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cellbioedHome page
N. Armstrong, S.-M. Chang, and M. Brickman
Cooperative Learning in Industrial-sized Biology Classes
CBE Life Sci Educ, June 1, 2007; 6(2): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cellbioedHome page
R. W. Preszler, A. Dawe, C. B. Shuster, and M. Shuster
Assessment of the Effects of Student Response Systems on Student Learning and Attitudes over a Broad Range of Biology Courses
CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2007; 6(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
S. Torke, R. R. Abraham, K. Ramnarayan, and S. Upadhya
Peer-Guided Cooperative Learning Enhances the Performance of Refresher Students
Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2007; 31(1): 118 - 118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
M. J. Giuliodori, H. L. Lujan, and S. E. DiCarlo
Peer instruction enhanced student performance on qualitative problem-solving questions
Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2006; 30(4): 168 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
J. Kibble, P. A. Hansen, and L. Nelson
Use of modified SOAP notes and peer-led small-group discussion in a Medical Physiology course: addressing the hidden curriculum
Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2006; 30(4): 230 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
H. L. Lujan and S. E. DiCarlo
First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles
Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2006; 30(1): 13 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
H. L. Lujan and S. E. DiCarlo
Too much teaching, not enough learning: what is the solution?
Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2006; 30(1): 17 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
R. N. Cortright, H. L. Collins, and S. E. DiCarlo
Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2005; 29(2): 107 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
S. Kumar
AN INNOVATIVE METHOD TO ENHANCE INTERACTION DURING LECTURE SESSIONS
Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2003; 27(1): 20 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
N. J. Pelaez
PROBLEM-BASED WRITING WITH PEER REVIEW IMPROVES ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PHYSIOLOGY
Advan Physiol Educ, September 1, 2002; 26(3): 174 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online